X-bar theory

From UNL Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Noun Phrase)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
*C = conjunction (head of a [[#Complementizer Phrase|Complementizer Phrase]] or CP)
 
*C = conjunction (head of a [[#Complementizer Phrase|Complementizer Phrase]] or CP)
  
== Noun Phrase ==
+
== Phrases ==  
Head = Nouns or nominals (personal pronouns, demonstrative pronouns, nominalizations, etc)
+
Specifier = [[#Determiner Phrase|Determiner Phrase]]
+
Complement = [[#Prepositional Phrase|Prepositional Phrase]] (to be used only in case of deverbals, i.e., nouns derived from (transitive) verbs)
+
Adjunct = [[#Adjective Phrase|Adjective Phrase]] or [[#Prepositional Phrase|Prepositional Phrase]]
+
 
+
=== Examples ===
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
Noun phrases are maximal projections of nouns. In a noun phrase, the specifier is always a [[#Determiner Phrase|determiner phrase]]
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
Phrases ==
+
 
{|border=1 cellpadding=2 align=center
 
{|border=1 cellpadding=2 align=center
 
!rowspan=5|PHRASE
 
!rowspan=5|PHRASE
Line 60: Line 44:
 
!colspan=5|XP
 
!colspan=5|XP
 
|-
 
|-
!rowspan=3|SPEC
+
!rowspan=2|SPEC
 
!colspan=4|XB
 
!colspan=4|XB
 
|-
 
|-
!rowspan=2|ADJT
 
 
!colspan=2|XB
 
!colspan=2|XB
 
!rowspan=2|ADJT
 
!rowspan=2|ADJT
Line 70: Line 53:
 
!COMP
 
!COMP
 
|-
 
|-
!rowspan=4|NP
+
!NP
 
!DP
 
!DP
 
!JP
 
!JP
Line 77: Line 60:
 
!JP,PP
 
!JP,PP
 
|-
 
|-
|the
 
|fateful
 
|construction
 
|of Babel
 
|by mankind
 
|-
 
|many
 
|beautiful
 
|tables
 
|
 
|of wood
 
|-
 
|no
 
|
 
|one
 
|
 
|
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 14:44, 20 January 2010

The syntactic framework of the UNLarium derives from the X-bar theory [1], whose general structure is depicted below:

    XP
   / \
spec  XB
     / \
    XB  adjunct
   / \
  X   comp
  |
head

In the above:

  • X is the head, the nucleus or the source of the whole syntactic structure, which is actually derived (or projected) out of it.
  • comp (i.e., complement) is an internal argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which is necessary to the head to complete its meaning (e.g., objects of transitive verbs)
  • adjunct is a word, phrase or clause which modifies the head but which is not syntactically required by it (adjuncts are expected to be extranuclear, i.e., removing an adjunct would leave a grammatically well-formed sentence)
  • spec (i.e., specifier) is an external argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which qualifies (determines) the head
  • XB (X-bar) is the general name for any of the intermediate projections derived from X
  • XP (X-bar-bar, X-double-bar, X-phrase) is the maximal projection of X.

A key assumption of X-bar theory is that branching is always binary, if it occurs. This means that there can be as many XBs as necessary. Specifiers, complements and adjuncts are optional and are themselves syntactically complex, i.e., they correspond to XPs.

The X-bar theory is claimed to describe a universal principle of natural languages, which is subject to language specific parametrization concerning the order of the constituents (left specification x right specification, left adjunction x right adjunction, left complementation x right complementation), but not the role of constituents (specifier, adjunct, complement, head) or the possible heads.

Heads

In the UNLarium approach to the X-bar theory, the heads, which should replace the letter X, and which define the nature of the phrase, may be occupied by the following categories [2]

Phrases

PHRASE STRUCTURE
XP
SPEC XB
XB ADJT
HEAD COMP
NP DP JP N PP JP,PP

References

  1. Chomsky, Noam (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In: R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.) Reading in English Transformational Grammar, 184-221. Waltham: Ginn.
  2. In the X-bar theory, adverbs are subsumed by prepositions and are not considered to be an independent lexical category.
Software