Talk:Periphrasis
From UNL Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Two-step generation: new section) |
(→Two-step generation) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The first rule makes be > be speaking; the second makes be > will be. | The first rule makes be > be speaking; the second makes be > will be. | ||
Shouldn't it be "first rule makes speak > be speaking"? | Shouldn't it be "first rule makes speak > be speaking"? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Vzakharov|Vzakharov]] 14:53, 28 August 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | And here: | ||
| + | VH(%vh,FUT,PGS):=+IC([be],+FUT;+GER); | ||
| + | |||
| + | Shouldn't it be "%vh,+GER"? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Vzakharov|Vzakharov]] 14:58, 28 August 2012 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:58, 28 August 2012
Seems there's some mistake here ("two" and "a couple of" mixed)
- dual: book > two books
- NH(%nh,DUA):=+NS(%nh,+PLR;DH("two"));
- The determiner phrase "a couple of" is generated as the specifier of the head, which receives the feature PLR (plural).
But I don't dare to modify it myself Vzakharov 14:49, 28 August 2012 (CEST)
Two-step generation
Same here: The first rule makes be > be speaking; the second makes be > will be. Shouldn't it be "first rule makes speak > be speaking"?
Vzakharov 14:53, 28 August 2012 (CEST)
And here: VH(%vh,FUT,PGS):=+IC([be],+FUT;+GER);
Shouldn't it be "%vh,+GER"?
Vzakharov 14:58, 28 August 2012 (CEST)
