Syntactic relations: Difference between revisions

From UNLwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Vzakharov
No edit summary
imported>Martins
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Imho it's impossible to complete the CLEA450 test on Syntactic Roles (II) by using just this wiki (and the X-bar theory page as well). It doesn't explain "trace", "tail", "scope" - or there are some redundant options in the list. [[User:Vzakharov|Vzakharov]] 21:42, 23 August 2012 (CEST)
'''Syntactic roles''' are the roles that constituents play inside a syntactic structure. The UNL<sup>arium</sup> framework follows the [[Syntax|X-bar approach]] and proposes four syntactic roles:
 
*'''HEAD''' is the nucleus or the source of the whole syntactic structure, which is actually derived (or projected) out of it.
*'''COMP''' (i.e., complement) is an internal argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which is necessary to the head to complete its meaning (e.g., objects of transitive verbs);
*'''ADJT''' (i.e., adjunct) is a word, phrase or clause which modifies the head but which is not syntactically required by it (adjuncts are expected to be extranuclear, i.e., removing an adjunct would leave a grammatically well-formed sentence);
*'''SPEC''' (i.e., specifier) is an external argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which qualifies (determines) the head;
 
== Examples ==
Consider, for instance, the examples below:
 
;1. Verbal phrase:
<quote>Peter gave a new book to Mary yesterday.</quote>
:*"gave" is the HEAD (nucleus) of the verbal phrase "Peter gave a new book to Mary yesterday".
:*"a new book" and "to Mary" are COMP (complements) of "gave"
:*"yesterday" is an ADJT (adjunct) of "gave"
:*"Peter" is the SPEC (specifier) of "gave"

Revision as of 17:31, 13 August 2013

Syntactic roles are the roles that constituents play inside a syntactic structure. The UNLarium framework follows the X-bar approach and proposes four syntactic roles:

  • HEAD is the nucleus or the source of the whole syntactic structure, which is actually derived (or projected) out of it.
  • COMP (i.e., complement) is an internal argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which is necessary to the head to complete its meaning (e.g., objects of transitive verbs);
  • ADJT (i.e., adjunct) is a word, phrase or clause which modifies the head but which is not syntactically required by it (adjuncts are expected to be extranuclear, i.e., removing an adjunct would leave a grammatically well-formed sentence);
  • SPEC (i.e., specifier) is an external argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which qualifies (determines) the head;

Examples

Consider, for instance, the examples below:

1. Verbal phrase

<quote>Peter gave a new book to Mary yesterday.</quote>

  • "gave" is the HEAD (nucleus) of the verbal phrase "Peter gave a new book to Mary yesterday".
  • "a new book" and "to Mary" are COMP (complements) of "gave"
  • "yesterday" is an ADJT (adjunct) of "gave"
  • "Peter" is the SPEC (specifier) of "gave"